Honest Errors? Combat Decision-Making 75 Years After the Hostage Case

Lieferzeit: Lieferbar innerhalb 14 Tagen

181,89 

ISBN: 946265610X
ISBN 13: 9789462656109
Herausgeber: Nobuo Hayashi/Carola Lingaas
Verlag: Springer Verlag GmbH
Umfang: xv, 306 S., 10 s/w Illustr., 2 farbige Illustr., 306 p. 12 illus., 2 illus. in color.
Erscheinungsdatum: 05.10.2023
Auflage: 1/2024
Produktform: Gebunden/Hardback
Einband: Gebunden

Chapters structured in chronological and thematic arc strengthen understanding of concepts evolution and expansionCutting-edge historical research using contemporaneous material undergirds critical reappraisal of legal developmentEthical considerations taking concept out of settled law enhance grasp of its significance and limitation in society

Artikelnummer: 9675077 Kategorie:

Beschreibung

This book marks the 75th anniversary of the 1948 Hostage Case in which a US military tribunal in Nuremberg acquitted General Lothar Rendulic of devastating Northern Norway on account of his honest factual error. The volume critically reappraises the law and facts underlying his trial, the no second-guessing rule in customary international humanitarian law (IHL) that is named after the general himself, and the assessment of modern battlefield decisions.Using recently discovered documents, this volume casts major doubts on Rendulics claim that he considered the regions total devastation and the forcible evacuation of all of its inhabitants imperatively demanded by military necessity at the time. This books analysis of court records reveals how the tribunal failed to examine relevant facts or explain the Rendulic Rules legal origin. This anthology shows that, despite the Hostage Cases ambiguity and occasional suggestions to thecontrary, objective reasonableness forms part of the reasonable commander test under IHL and the mistake of fact defence under international criminal law (ICL) to which the rule has given rise. This collection also identifies modern warfares characteristicshuman judgment, de-empathetic battlespace, and institutional biasthat may make it problematic to deem some errors both honest and reasonable. The Rendulic Rule embodies an otherwise firmly established admonition against judging contentious battlefield decisions with hindsight. Nevertheless, it was born of a factually ill-suited case and continues to raise significant legal as well as ethical challenges today.The most comprehensive study of the Rendulic Rule ever to appear in English, this multi-disciplinary anthology will appeal to researchers and practitioners of IHL and ICL, as well as military historians and military ethicists and offers ground-breaking new research.Nobuo Hayashi is affiliated to the Centre for International and Operational Law at the Swedish Defence University in Stockholm, Sweden. Carola Lingaas is affiliated to the Faculty of Social Studies at VID Specialized University in Oslo, Norway.

Autorenporträt

Nobuo Hayashi is affiliated to the Centre for International and Operational Law at the Swedish Defence University in Stockholm, Sweden. Carola Lingaas is affiliated to the Faculty of Social Studies at VID Specialized University in Oslo, Norway.

Herstellerkennzeichnung:


Springer Verlag GmbH
Tiergartenstr. 17
69121 Heidelberg
DE

E-Mail: juergen.hartmann@springer.com

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen …