Beschreibung
This book provides an analysis of how inspection teams evaluate schools - especially how they decide on assigning scores. It shows how the governance of schools through evaluation is enacted pragmatically. With its focus on the practice of evaluation by a group of external experts, it contributes to the expanding interdisciplinary field devoted to studying phenomena of the evaluation society spanning from assessment research to programme evaluation, from the psychology of decision-making to the sociology of valuation and evaluation. Additionally, it argues that official inspection systems frame the inspection process, but cannot fully determine scoring practice. The implementation of official scoring guidelines is characterized by irreducible uncertainty requiring professional discretion for its resolution. Inspection teams thus must employ a flexible and pragmatic approach to finalize their scoring task. By drawing on empirical data from six observed inspection teams from two German states, it provides profound insights into how real evaluation decisions were made. This book is valuable to anyone seeking to understand evaluation in education - in particular scholars, policy-makers and educators in the field of school evaluation and accountability.
Autorenporträt
Moritz G. Sowada has extensive publishing experience in the field of educational evaluation. This includes twelve book chapters, three journal articles as well as his PhD thesis titled: One Cannot Leave It Undecided: On the Dynamic Production of Scoring Decisions in the School Inspection Process. This provides him with intimate knowledge of the field and enables him to continue making substantial contributions. Additionally, he is managing editor of the diamond open-access journal On_Education. Journal for Research and Debate, a reviewer, symposium organiser and presenter at national and international conferences.
Herstellerkennzeichnung:
Springer Verlag GmbH
Tiergartenstr. 17
69121 Heidelberg
DE
E-Mail: juergen.hartmann@springer.com
